| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear Colleagues, Several updates: 1)
Proposed comment responses are posted Our editors have produces proposed responses for comments
submitted against D1.1, which are posted here: Excel: http://www.ieee1904.org/1/private/contributions/2011_02/siepon_1102_comments_proposed.xls
PDF: http://www.ieee1904.org/1/private/contributions/2011_02/siepon_1102_comments_proposed.pdf
3 editorial comments were reclassified as technical. Our
final tally is 380 technical and 145 editorial comments. We should be able to cover all comments at the meeting and
not have any carry-over comments for D1.2. Action required: Please,
become familiar with the comments and the proposed responses before the meeting. 2) Resolution of Editorial Comments To save time, we will try to accept all editorial comments
in bulk. Accepting in bulk means that the final responses for these comments
will be exactly as editors proposed. Any full or attaining member of the
working group has a right to disagree with the response proposed by an editor.
Even a single disagreement is enough to take the comment our of bulk and bring
it up for discussion by the WG members. In the end, only those comments will
remain in BULK group, for which all WG members agree with the proposed
response. Action required: I
would like to ask everyone to review editorial comments and submit to the Chief
Editor the numbers of all editorial comments that you would like to be discussed
individually. Please, do this before the beginning of the meeting, so that these
comments can be discussed in their proper order within each clause. When your
requested comment is brought up for discussion, please be ready to provide
specific reasons why you disagree with the proposed response. For your convenience, all editorial comments extracted into
a separate pdf: http://www.ieee1904.org/1/private/contributions/2011_02/siepon_1102_comments_proposed_editorial.pdf
3) Updates to the agenda It was pointed to me that presentations from Yuanling He (Protection
for SIEPON) and Chengwei Wang (Power Saving Mechanism for SIEPON Package C),
which were submitted as stand-alone proposals, are in reality supplemental
files to existing comments. Correspondingly, the agenda was modified to not
show these presentations as separate agenda items. Rather their times were
rolled into comment resolution times for the respective clauses. Also, since
these files were submitted after the comment deadline, they were moved to
post-deadline area and the corresponding comments are also treated as
post-deadline. The updated agenda (v0.4) is posted here: http://www.ieee1904.org/1/meeting_info/siepon_1102_agenda.pdf
I wish you all safe and easy travels and looking forward to
seeing everyone in Vancouver. Glen |