Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[IEEE1904.1] FW: 1904 ANWG August meeting: Call for Contributions



All,

 

I am copying this message to the SIEPON reflector, as I see there are many people who still did not subscribe to the 1904 and 1904.2 reflectors. 

 

Please, make sure you have subscribed to these two reflectors:

 

stds-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Public WG reflector

        Used for general WG announcements (meetings, calls for contributions, etc.)

        To subscribe, send email to listserv@xxxxxxxx and include this line in the body of the message:
subscribe stds-1904-WG firstname lastname

        Archive is public (http://www.ieee1904.org/wg_pub_archive.shtml)

 

stds-1904-2-TF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Public TF2 reflector

        Used for TF2 technical discussions

        To subscribe, send email to listserv@xxxxxxxx and include this line in the body of the message:
subscribe stds-1904-2-TF firstname lastname

        Archive is public (http://www.ieee1904.org/2/tf2_pub_archive.shtml)

 

Below, please, see the call for 1904.2 technical contributions.

 

Regards,

Glen

 

From: stds-1904-2-tf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-2-tf@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Glen Kramer
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 10:30 AM
To: STDS-1904-2-TF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 1904 ANWG August meeting: Call for Contributions

 

Dear ANWG members,

 

 

As a reminder, at the last meeting, several people had taken the following action items (see http://www.ieee1904.org/2/meeting_archive/2014/06/tf2_1406_closing.pdf):

 

·         Glen: Produce a figure showing single UMC domain spanning multiple L2 domains

·         Marek: Proposal for draft structure (main parts)

·         Curtis and Mark: EPOC management of CNU via FCU

·         Curtis and Mark: Management of demark device

        Connected to ONU/CNU

        Can be L2 only or L2/L3

·         Hesham: L2 tunneling to support SDN and virtualization of ONUs and middle boxes (FCU, DPU, CMC)

        Include how OpenFlow protocol maps to UMC message format.

 

Other contributions that can lead to baseline proposals are welcome as well. Of particular importance at this time are contributions on the following topics:

 

1)      Types of management payloads that need to be supported

2)      Requirements for the UMT

a.       Max. Bandwidth or frame rate

b.      Latency bounds

c.       Reliability

3)      UMT discovery protocol

a.       Server-initiated vs. client-initiated

 

If you plan a contribution on any of these or other topics, please submit it using the online submission form at http://www.ieee1904.org/2/private/tf2_presentproc.shtml

 

Thank you,

Glen