RE: Few notes after the Louisville April meeting..
Jouni,
I'm glad we made progress on the skeleton of the document, but I have a counter-proposal for standard operating procedure.
If we're just trying to introduce a concept, I could see cases where PPT, XLS, or other formats might work to introduce/debate the concept. If the idea is accepted, then the advocate for that idea should generally be responsible for putting the idea into the template.
I like what you're saying, but I'm suggesting that there's probably a predecessor stage where we may want to explicitly have it in a different format so that it doesn't look like it's integrated. [I've had experiences with other standards groups where competing proposals for concepts made to draft specs made it difficult to evaluate the concept and compare differing approaches. In those cases, we've found that getting the idea reviewed discretely was easier and more time-efficient: we don't waste time word-smithing ideas when the concept isn't approved.]
Thoughts?
--kb
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-1904-3-tf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-3-tf@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:57 AM
To: STDS-1904-3-TF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Few notes after the Louisville April meeting..
Folks,
Go and check the opening report at http://www.ieee1904.org/3/meeting_archive/2015/04/tf3_1504_opening.pdf for the opening report and the 1904.3 timeline. That is pretty aggressive..
Also, for the future contributions/changes/proposal, please use the word document template found at http://www.ieee1904.org/3/meeting_archive/2015/04/tf3_1504_korhonen_1a.docx. This is just a template for drafts and an attempt to make the life of the editor easier. The current word document also captures nicely most of the discussion we had here at the meeting.
- Jouni
--
Jouni Korhonen, CTO Office, Networking, Broadcom Corporation
O: +1-408-922-8135, M: +1-408-391-7160