Re: fractional nanoseconds
Hi,
I was thinking the same as 1588 can do i.e. 1/65536 ns.
Jouni
Sent from a smart phone.. Mind the typos..
> Marek Hajduczenia <marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti 2.5.2015 kello 9.32:
>
> Jouni,
>
> What would be the resolution of these fractional nanoseconds?
>
> Marek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-1904-3-tf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-3-tf@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 6:30 PM
> To: STDS-1904-3-TF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: fractional nanoseconds
>
> Folks,
>
> We have already had some discussion on this topic earlier but.. what is your
> opinion on having fractional nanosecond accuracy in the time stamping (e.g.
> when sending a timestamp in the RoE header)? If we follow what 1588 did for
> the correction field that would mean 16 additional bits, which may or may
> not be significant overhead wise.
>
> Comments & opinions?
>
> - Jouni
>
> --
> Jouni Korhonen, CTO Office, Networking, Broadcom Corporation
> O: +1-408-922-8135, M: +1-408-391-7160
>