Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Kevin and Jouni, Although, HARQ latency in LTE based system is as you mention, this is expected to be reduced as we move towards 5G (e.g., could go towards 1msec). In addition,
smaller cell size is expected to co-exist and this will reduce the link traversal time for such smaller cells. Assuming the specification is forward looking, it would be good to have profile based latency targets, e.g., profile for LTE and legacy system could stay with
1 msec one way latency, whereas, profile for 5G and small cell could target lower latency. Regards,
-
mohammad Mohammad Akhter | Director, Architecture | Direct: 1 (613) 595 6279 | Mobile: 1 (613) 286 1840 |
www.idt.com From: stds-1904-3-tf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1904-3-tf@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Kevin, Within the current mappers and use cases <1ms one way delay should be just fine. I think we can assume that in this version of the to-be-spec safely. Jouni
On Mar 28, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Bross, Kevin <kevin.bross@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|