That also largely depends on what the scope of the said work is, and what we are trying to build model-wise From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx <stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kevin A Noll
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 9:51 AM
To: STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [1904-ANWG] draft of 1904 ANWG liaison response to BBF Liaision on YANG models If the group chooses, I would work on it, also. In fact, I have to work on it anyway, whether it’s done in 1904 or not. —kan—
I could definitely work on that, but I am just one person myself I am wondering if anyone in this group would support development of a YANG model inside 1904. If this is a possibility, then we should include language to that effect in the response. We will discuss this on the call on Thursday. [resent to correct email list] The draft response is attached. The text in yellow highlight will need to be edited by Glen once he finds out the status of whether a copy of the standard can be sent as an attachment. So, editor license will need to be left to the WG Chair. Here is the draft agenda. Please, reply if you would like to change anything. Mark – if you have draft liaison response ready, please submit it for posting.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1 |