Re: [1904-ANWG] P1904.3 PAR

[Glen Kramer <000006d1020766de-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxx>]

Marek,

 

I think that because we are not starting from scratch, but can use the 1904.1 as a base, it will be doable with this deadline. But I didn’t think about including YANG models, so you may be right too.

 

The YANG discussion at the meeting was inconclusive. If through later discussions, the WG decides that we want to specify YANG models, maybe it should be a separate project. This way, it can target all EPON flavors, not just 25G and 50G-EPON.

 

-Glen

 

From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 3:11 PM
To: STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [1904-ANWG] P1904.3 PAR

 

Thank you, Glen

 

I do not have any comments on the draft as it is right now. The timeline might be a tad aggressive, especially if we do need to develop YANG models for new EPON

 

Marek

 

From: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx <stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Glen Kramer
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 12:05 PM
To: stds-1904-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: P1904.3 PAR

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Per an action item from the last teleconference, I entered the 1904.3 PAR text into myProject.

Attached is a complete draft P1904.3 PAR for the proposed project for the 25G-EPON and 50G-EPON system-level standard.

 

Let’s discuss and refine this draft via email, so that at our next teleconference on March 25^th, we can just put it to the vote.

 

Thank you,

-Glen

 

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1