I assume BBF YANG models are more related to the services, not the underlying technology? Or, is that a bad assumption?
From: Kevin A Noll <ieee.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 12:00 PM
To: STDS-1904-WG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [1904-ANWG] draft of 1904 ANWG liaison response to BBF Liaision on YANG models
1. The BBF has not started a model for EPON.
2. BBF has very specific models for network architecture and service architecture. These models do not always reflect the wider industry. Their YANG modules reflect this and I think it would be beneficial to have models that can be used
by a wider audience.
3. I do not regularly attend ITU-T meetings, so do not have the latest info, but I am unaware of any YANG models that ITU-T has created for PON.
5. I actually see this as an opportunity for the BBF and IEEE 1904 to work together.
—kan—
What would be the motivation to develop YANG models under 1904 instead of in BBF?
I see some reasons to not do it under 1904.
BBF already started this work and they are planning to assimilate the existing models from ITU-T and IEEE 802.3. They have a better chance to make YANG models (more) common for EPON and GPON than we can do it
in 1904.
The only advantage of doing it in 1904 that I can see is that the 1904 WG probably has better understanding of minute nuances of EPON operation and may make EPON YANG models more accurate. But if interested people
with EPON expertise (like you and Marek) contribute to BBF YANG efforts, I think that could produce the best outcome.
Anyway, we should settle on this soon. I don’t want to give BBF some vague answer. Either we want them to include EPON YANG models or we want them to stay out of it.
I am wondering if anyone in this group would support development of a YANG model inside 1904. If this is a possibility, then we should include language to that effect in
the response.
We will discuss this on the call on Thursday.
[resent to correct email list]
The draft response is attached. The text in yellow highlight will need to be edited by Glen once he finds out the status of whether a copy of the standard can be sent as an attachment. So, editor license will
need to be left to the WG Chair.
Here is the draft agenda. Please, reply if you would like to change anything.
Mark – if you have draft liaison response ready, please submit it for posting.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-1904-WG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-1904-WG&A=1
|